View Full Version : Who Country Danger For World
Muhammad Arslan
03-13-2006, 03:18 PM
1- US, 2- Isreal, 3-Russia or Iran ?
Jordan
03-13-2006, 03:52 PM
1, 2, and 3.
korosh_kabir
03-13-2006, 04:51 PM
1, 2, and 3.
loool jordan good answer. :D
user0000
03-13-2006, 07:30 PM
LOL
Jordan, you are the reason why I love your people. USA is the best host nation Issa could ever ask for. :D
isr agent
03-13-2006, 08:08 PM
I think china.
AK-101
03-13-2006, 08:43 PM
1- US, 2- Isreal, 3-Russia or Iran ?
all 4, easy answer.
Mohmar 'Deathstrike'
03-14-2006, 07:49 AM
1- US, 2- Isreal, 3-Russia or Iran ?
1. USA
2. China
3. Russia
4. Israel
5. UK
6. India
7. France
8. Pakistan
9. Iran
4X-IL
03-14-2006, 08:29 AM
now can someone explain to mee
How's israel, US, UK, France, and India
are dangerous to the world?
attitude
03-14-2006, 08:42 AM
now can someone explain to mee
How's israel, US, UK, France, and India
are dangerous to the world?
Usa is dangerous to the world more than ever thanks to Bush Jnr
America is the single biggest exporter of arms in the world and it has a poor human rights record of late. Not to mention they are bombing places like Yemen, Pakistan and god knows who else. They have no right to play policeman to the world.
Uk is dangerous as long as it takes its orders from washington but its decreased defence spending is rapidly dropping them out of the top 10 most powerful countries in the world.
France isnt doing anything in the world right now to piss of anyone
Except the Ivory Coast airforce which they destroyed last year
India is only a danger to Pakistan
China would have to be the worlds most dangerous country
North Korea would be high on the list too
Mohmar 'Deathstrike'
03-14-2006, 09:02 AM
Usa is dangerous to the world more than ever thanks to Bush Jnr
America is the single biggest exporter of arms in the world and it has a poor human rights record of late. Not to mention they are bombing places like Yemen, Pakistan and god knows who else. They have no right to play policeman to the world.
Uk is dangerous as long as it takes its orders from washington but its decreased defence spending is rapidly dropping them out of the top 10 most powerful countries in the world.
France isnt doing anything in the world right now to piss of anyone
Except the Ivory Coast airforce which they destroyed last year
India is only a danger to Pakistan
China would have to be the worlds most dangerous country
North Korea would be high on the list too
I put France in the list because Chirac mentioned the possibility of a French nuclear first strike against perceived threats recently. I agree that India is not a danger in the military sense, but its growing economy will threaten the American, Europeam and Japanese leadership. It is only a threat militarily in that its nukes could be stolen. This is the reason I've put all nuclear countries on the list.
Jordan
03-15-2006, 08:13 PM
LOL
Jordan, you are the reason why I love your people. USA is the best host nation Issa could ever ask for. :D
thanks.
don't fret though. once the world rids itself of the huge abnormal fungal growth known as humanity it will progress peacefully.
:D
user0000
03-15-2006, 08:16 PM
thanks.
don't fret though. once the world rids itself of the huge abnormal fungal growth known as humanity it will progress peacefully.
:D
LOL
War is Peace
Ignorance is Strength
Mohmar 'Deathstrike'
03-16-2006, 06:49 PM
thanks.
don't fret though. once the world rids itself of the huge abnormal fungal growth known as humanity it will progress peacefully.
:D
You mean once the world rids itself of the huge abnormal growth called life. Animals fight all the time (even corals), I guess plants alsocompete for the brightest and most fertile spots.
Simple.. the countries that have the most power are the most dangerous. Wait till China and India become REAL superpowers. :D
hurdy
03-16-2006, 10:30 PM
now can someone explain to mee
How's israel, US, UK, France, and India
are dangerous to the world?
Easy, US, UK, France, Russia happen to be the world's largest arms exporters to 3rd world countries and militias..
For the past 100 years these countries have brought alot of trouble to the world, did alot of good too but their bad intentions overweigh these..
These countries performed coups, provided/used nuclear weapons, bio/chem weapons, colonised countries, engaged in pre-emptive wars etc etc..
attitude
03-17-2006, 05:33 AM
I put France in the list because Chirac mentioned the possibility of a French nuclear first strike against perceived threats recently. I agree that India is not a danger in the military sense, but its growing economy will threaten the American, Europeam and Japanese leadership. It is only a threat militarily in that its nukes could be stolen. This is the reason I've put all nuclear countries on the list.
Then if nuclear countries are on the list you would need to add a few more countries to the list
North Korea who openly admit to having nukes
South Africa who have long been suspected of having nukes
Argentina and Brazil have nuclear progams and in the past have been suspected
Also the Russian have "misplaced alot of nukes"
I wouldnt be surprised if Iran already has a few nukes aquired clandestinly from the former Soviet Union
I would bet Cuba maybe has 1 or 2 as well
One of Australia's worst kept secrets is that its nuclear armed.
A few Nato coutries have American Nukes for their fighter/bombers
I even read a story in the paper a few years back that said the Italian mafia had traded drugs for a nuke (highly unlikely but an interesting read though, more likely this would only happen in the movies, i didnt believe it then or now)
4X-IL
03-17-2006, 07:08 AM
I put France in the list because Chirac mentioned the possibility of a French nuclear first strike against perceived threats recently. I agree that India is not a danger in the military sense, but its growing economy will threaten the American, Europeam and Japanese leadership. It is only a threat militarily in that its nukes could be stolen. This is the reason I've put all nuclear countries on the list.
I know what you talking about, but i see it from a different point of view.
France doesn't want, and will not enter a situation like Israel's or like the US.
France doesn't want to have a war for years.
France is threating, and I have no doubt that this is not only a threat.
they are not afraid from using WMD if necessary like most of the countries which will have 1000 doubts before, and there's alot of reason why this is the right way to act.
Show them from the beginning that you are not playing any games with them, it will end and it will end now, leave my country alone or it will have serious consequences.
Of course there's a different between nuking a military base and a civilian city, and of course france will not react to attack with a nuke on major city, but to nuke a military base of the enemy country, can be a very smart move, definitely scary for the offensive country, and can stop a war just like that.
and if any guriella warfare continues inside france, the threat France can put on them is huge.
leftwing
03-17-2006, 10:21 AM
now can someone explain to mee
How's israel, US, UK, France, and India
are dangerous to the world?
Yeah! :rolleyes: I agree!! Can someone please do that? :D Its not like they have tons of nuclear weapons, invade other countries, occupy other people and bla bla bla bla..
haha you crack me up.
leftwing
03-17-2006, 10:23 AM
Easy, US, UK, France, Russia happen to be the world's largest arms exporters to 3rd world countries and militias..
For the past 100 years these countries have brought alot of trouble to the world, did alot of good too but their bad intentions overweigh these..
These countries performed coups, provided/used nuclear weapons, bio/chem weapons, colonised countries, engaged in pre-emptive wars etc etc..
I bow down before you ;)
Highsky
03-17-2006, 02:33 PM
If you want a real answer then you have to count :
(1)whichone has the most WMD in the world?
(2)whichone has invaded more then any other countery a weakker state?
(3)whichone has killed more innocet poeple in the history?
(4)whichone begon a war at all?
(5)whichone threats the other counteries ?
i dont give an answer because the calculating is not so difficult. GooD Luck
If you want a real answer then you have to count :
(1)whichone has the most WMD in the world?
(2)whichone has invaded more then any other countery a weakker state?
(3)whichone has killed more innocet poeple in the history?
(4)whichone begon a war at all?
(5)whichone threats the other counteries ?
i dont give an answer because the calculating is not so difficult. GooD LuckBut you are forgetting one important factor. What would those "weaker" nations do, if they were as powerful as the US? And don't forget what Arabs and Turks did to non-Muslims.
Mohmar 'Deathstrike'
03-20-2006, 09:06 AM
Then if nuclear countries are on the list you would need to add a few more countries to the list
North Korea who openly admit to having nukes
South Africa who have long been suspected of having nukes
Argentina and Brazil have nuclear progams and in the past have been suspected
Also the Russian have "misplaced alot of nukes"
I wouldnt be surprised if Iran already has a few nukes aquired clandestinly from the former Soviet Union
I would bet Cuba maybe has 1 or 2 as well
One of Australia's worst kept secrets is that its nuclear armed.
A few Nato coutries have American Nukes for their fighter/bombers
I even read a story in the paper a few years back that said the Italian mafia had traded drugs for a nuke (highly unlikely but an interesting read though, more likely this would only happen in the movies, i didnt believe it then or now)
There seems to be too little evidence that Brazil, South Africa and Argentina have nukes, since they all aborted their nuclear program. Cuba is just a speculation of yours :p. NATO countries will only obtain American nukes with full authorization of the US, making them non-sovereign nuclear powers. Are you sure this policy even exists after the cold war? Can you show me a link about Australia's nuclear armament?
North Korea has recently renounced nukes, and there was any evidence they ever posessed any, so it may have been a bluff. But of the countries wer just spoke of, North Korea is the most likely to actually posess nukes IMO.
attitude
03-20-2006, 10:24 AM
Here are some links about Australia's nuclear ambitions. I was in the army for 9 years :)
http://www.pcug.org.au/~mstreet/bomb/bomb.html
http://nuclearweaponarchive.org/Nwfaq/Nfaq7-5.html
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_with_nuclear_weapons
http://www.greenpeace.org.au/features/features_details.html?site_id=45&news_id=1567
South Africa actually had six nukes but has dismantled them now. It is suspected they developed them jointly with Israel
They are suspected of even carring out a test along with Israel that was detected by an american satelite. This is known as the Vela incident
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vela_Incident
http://www.isis-online.org/publications/terrorism/sastoragevault.html
Mohmar 'Deathstrike'
03-20-2006, 11:08 AM
I know what you talking about, but i see it from a different point of view.
France doesn't want, and will not enter a situation like Israel's or like the US.You mean France won't be a major occupying power in a foreign land?
France doesn't want to have a war for years.
France is threating, and I have no doubt that this is not only a threat.
they are not afraid from using WMD if necessary like most of the countries which will have 1000 doubts before, and there's alot of reason why this is the right way to act.
Show them from the beginning that you are not playing any games with them, it will end and it will end now, leave my country alone or it will have serious consequences.Probably, but France's main nuclear doctrine is one of deterrence and retaliatory strike.
Of course there's a different between nuking a military base and a civilian city, and of course france will not react to attack with a nuke on major city, but to nuke a military base of the enemy country, can be a very smart move, definitely scary for the offensive country, and can stop a war just like that.
But military bases are usually close enough to urban centers for radioactive fallout, if not the blast itself messing them up.
and if any guriella warfare continues inside france, the threat France can put on them is huge.
You mean France can threaten its own people with nukes? Because that would be insanity:eek:
Jordan
03-20-2006, 03:03 PM
(1)whichone has the most WMD in the world? U.S.
(2)whichone has invaded more then any other countery a weakker state? Far too many to count.
(3)whichone has killed more innocet poeple in the history? In recent history probably Russia (Stalin)
(4)whichone begon a war at all? Wow, a lot of countries start wars. That is how their is war in the first place.
(5)whichone threats the other counteries ? U.S., China, and Iran are the most recent. Although you could count France, but Chirac was very ambiguous about it.
vBulletin® v3.7.0, Copyright ©2000-2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.